Sat,sciencehw and Study,math Study,read the Crusable

(Natural News) A shocking new report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing iv out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is cocky-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-xix Vaccine Condom in Pregnant Persons." Just as agonizing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attending by a Life Site News commodity, we checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double cheque all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm 2 things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this written report was nigh certainly a comprehend-up to attempt to merits vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safety. But the written report data actually show quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the tertiary trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 significant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their showtime vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their outset or second trimesters. (Y'all have to read the fine print below the tabular array to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their starting time or 2d trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week marking. These are indicated every bit "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In unproblematic math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the get-go 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions amongst these significant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their tertiary trimester, by definition.

Thus, the report authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should take used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their start or second trimesters.

Put another manner, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the outset 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the start 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to summate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an laurels in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they obviously tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it announced that vaccines are prophylactic for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than four out of 5 unborn babies in the beginning 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (Information technology'south a small prepare of 127 meaning women, and so we'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more than clear motion-picture show.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a handbag of l lemons and 50 limes, with a scientific discipline study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are xanthous?" The scientists count all the yellowish fruit and reach the number l. They mistakenly split up 50 into 100 because in that location are 100 total slice of fruit, then they declare, "fifty% of lemons are yellow" because it'due south 50/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit tin't possibly be included because they're limes, not lemons. And so the right math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct answer.

In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were merely vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" tin occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either tin't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the world effectually us.

Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the beginning xx weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're roofing upward the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the primal writer of the report, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. Information technology raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the aforementioned error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, here'south another report he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did non identify any new or unexpected safety concerns later on TIV-ID."

But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the written report on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Peradventure this same written report architect has made the aforementioned systematic fault (or perchance a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. Information technology wouldn't be the start time i author was constitute to have fabricated systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We tin can't just have bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the hateful time, information technology's articulate that 4 out of five pregnancies are being terminated past covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at to the lowest degree, co-ordinate to the pocket-sized data ready we have so far). And that ways the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins straight set on reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise any that they are achieving a high charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on significant women is "shameful." You tin hear him in his own words in the post-obit interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet past iii.2 one thousand thousand over the next twelvemonth, in the U.s. alone, if every pregnant adult female is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "barbarism."

The fields of medicine and science accept turned against humanity. They are at present killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, centre attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the man race. And live-built-in babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'south country management arbiter once characterized human children as an "environmental gamble."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And information technology goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual expose of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to exist motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity'southward destruction.

Acquire more than in today's mind-opening State of affairs Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://world wide web.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

quintanasurew1950.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post